A Pre-Inaugural Message for President Elect McElroy, from Caught Red Handed
Jeremy McElroy will be the 102nd President of the Alma Matar Society. That fact is now well established. Established, to be sure, amid controversy, but established nonetheless.
Caught Red Handed did not endorse Jeremy McElroy. Caught Red Handed called for his resignation following the websitegate scandal. Most recently, Caught Red Handed called for a blue ribbon commission to investigate the websitegate scandal, determine its facts including possible deterministic effects on the results of the presidential election, and report to the Student Council and the students at large this information and possible courses of action.
But politics are dynamic. Policies that made sense last year, or for that matter, yesterday, may not make sense tomorrow. Ignorance is the unwillingness to change view in light of new information. None of the actions previously called for in relation to websitegate or President McElroy's impending presidency make sense anymore, given the social and political climate of the UBC and the AMS.
Caught Red Handed, therefore, is obliged to extend Mr. McElroy the respect he is due, as the soon-to-be president of our beloved student union. He will be the leader and the highest manifestation of student authority at UBC held by any individual person. As such, he demands, and deserves, our respect.
I took several days to meditate and reflect on McElroy's apology for websitegate.
(It can be found here: http://www.votejeremy.com/2011/01/an-open-apology/ )
Apologies, especially political ones, may have many motivations. There is no doubt that this apology was written with an eye toward pacifying the upset over the scandal. In the past, I raised further questions about its late date of issue. Nonetheless, after careful reading, I find there is a genuine apology at its core. A genuine desire, moral as well as I'm sure, practical, to go back and undo what had been done.
At the last AMS meeting, our dear president Bijan also apologized. Amid criticisms of Bijan, McElroy, and the AMS at large, it is essential to remember that humans are fallible. The cause for concern should not be those who carefully accept this fallibility, but rather, those who attempt to deny it. Those who deny their fallibility are surely the most flawed.
McElroy says, in the apology, that he is ashamed of his actions. I don't doubt that. They were shameful. But there is nothing to be gained from dwelling on the past. Everyone has done things of which they are not proud. There is a courage required to accept this, and continue. This is the courage of the gentleman who accepts his fundamental human limitations but does not cede to them more than he must, who begins everyday determined to do his best in spite of them. This is the message of McElroy's apology, and it is a good one.
Any lingering concerns I had about the apology were assuaged last Wednesday. The AMS meeting on Wednesday demonstrated to me that Mr. McElroy deserves more than the minimum of respect with which his office may afford him. His conduct since websitegate, and at other times in the campaign, was nothing if not honorable.
Most notably, his decision to abstain on a tremendously unjustified motion censuring our current president, Bijan, deserves respect and admiration. The animosity between McElroy and Bijan is clear to all. McElroy's decision, though perhaps motivated in some part by self interest - censuring a president ostensibly for election misconduct would be a dangerous precedent for him to set for reasons which should presently be quite clear - was, I think, fundamentally rooted in his acknowledgment that he could never be impartial in such a vote.
McElroy must have had an emotional and political desire to see Bijan censured, yet he abstained. There can be little doubt that this, and the rest of his conduct during the most recent AMS meeting foretold a genuine, mature desire to set aside differences and get into the real business of governing.
It is that business of governing, after all, that McElroy has sought to do throughout his extensive involvement with the AMS.
Caught Red Handed does not flip flop. Even during my most honest and scathing criticism of websitegate, I never doubted McElroy's sincere desire and eminent ability to lead the AMS, if given the proper mandate. It looks as thought he has received the mandate he needed.
President Elect McElroy - you have our respect. We respect your restraint, your maturity, and your authority.
Now I urge you to use all those to the most honorable ends. Improve our student union and our school. Be honest and open and transparent. Don't get caught in conflicts. Not within your executive, not within the AMS, and not with the university, the province, or the federal government. Seek cooperation and genuinely positive change. If you do, we will support you.
Even if you make decisions and pursue policies that we consider destructive, we will continue to respect your authority and your office so long as you uphold the democratic values it represents.
I remember when Rush Limbaugh, a radio host for whom I previously had substantial respect, publicly expressed his desire the United States should suffer and flounder, so that the American people would see the mistake they made in electing President Obama. I've never thought of Rush the same way since. I had been a McCain supporter since well before his intention to run for president in 2008 had been declared. I thought, and still think, McCain was the right choice for the United States. But to hope for your people to suffer for any kind of political gain is among the most heinous forms of treason. All more heinous because it lacks even the grand, if misguided narrative of a true rebel.
Caught Red Handed is not Rush Limbaugh. We do not wish you fail, Mr President Elect. We wish you, and our student union, every success. Don't let us down.
It is no secret that you have strong allies in the campus media, Mr. McElroy. Your cousin edits the UBC. Your girlfriend is similarly involved in its publication. AMS Insiders endorsed you and its editor has publicly supported you. AMS Condifential also endorsed you, and shares with you intimate personal connections too complex to state here. They may sing your praises, but I would encourage not to look to them, tempting as it may be, for an evaluation of the job you're doing.
The Shah of Iran was deposed because he listened to the wrong people. In the weeks before the revolution that threw him into the exile in which he would eventually die, the United States could have easily intervened on his behalf, indefinitely safeguarding his regime. They didn't because he didn't ask them to. He didn't ask them to because right up until the end, his own security team - top notch by any metric - was telling him everything was fine. Of course, they had good reason to. The Shah didn't like bad news. And nobody wanted to give it to him. His intelligence services, well acquainted with the terminal risks to his reign, fed him good news to save their own lives - ultimately at the expense of his government's (he died in exile of natural causes, his government died in terror made by men). Don't listen to those who have every desire to feed you good news and well wishes. Listen to Caught Red Handed, and its ilk. I'll be fair, but thorough.
I suspect you'll have little difficulty listening to the independent blogosphere right now. Caught Red Handed, among others, are eager to see you succeed. But in times of criticism and crisis when the temptation retreat into your well-regarded inner circle will be greatest, embrace the outer circle the most. It is then that you will need Caught Red Handed more than ever, and it is then that Caught Red Handed will need you. Need you to listen clearly, and act decisively on what you hear.
Do good work, honestly, and I assure you that you won't get CAUGHT, RED HANDED.
Exposing commis, fiberals and social [in]justice types - and looking good doing it.
Barry Goldwater, Our Chief Inspiration Officer

Moderation In The Pursuit Of Justice Is No Virtue; Extremism In The Defense Of Liberty Is No Vice
Saturday, January 29, 2011
On Your Skin, You Know We're Right
If I ever start my own skin care line I want to Barry Goldwater on every product. Look at the guy!
Bright skin full of vitality and so clear you can see right through to his conciencse, the conscience, indeed, of a conservative. Our slogan? On your skin, you know we're right! Because moderation in the pursuit of style is no virtue, and extremism in the defense of skin is no vice.
You gotta love the proto-hipster glasses too.
If you didn't catch the references with which this article is brimming... you probably never will.
Bright skin full of vitality and so clear you can see right through to his conciencse, the conscience, indeed, of a conservative. Our slogan? On your skin, you know we're right! Because moderation in the pursuit of style is no virtue, and extremism in the defense of skin is no vice.
You gotta love the proto-hipster glasses too.
If you didn't catch the references with which this article is brimming... you probably never will.
Clinique for Me[n]
Clinique for Me[n]
A note on terminology: I don't like the term cosmetics (I'll use it only when absolutely fitting). Neither do I like the word grooming, it sounds like something animals get done to them (again, it's occasionally called for).
My objection to these terms isn't just their feminine (former) or animal (latter) connotations. They're fundamentally inaccurate. Personal care is more closely related to other comprehensive health practices than it is to purely aesthetic ones (like choosing the right deep V). The complexity and chemistry involved in finding good personal care products is more like the complexity and chemistry involved in finding the right foods to eat and the right exercises to do.
Men's personal care companies don't embrace any of the existing terminology either. I predict that in the
next ten years, the industry - and its consumers (like me) - will settle on one word which will become predominant. In the interim, there are all sorts of wacky attempts at circumventing classic terminology.
Clinque, the focus of this article, bills its line of men’s care products simply as 'skin supplies for men'. Supplies? Sounds more like Officemax or Staples than Beautyboutique. But E for effort, Clinque, and way to keep your simple theme and character consistent (more on that later).
Of all the euphemisms and creative copy writing, my favorite belongs to Anthony Logistics for Men. They're so good they even built it into their name. What's their name? Anthony Logistics for Men. What does their range offer? Logistics... for men. Touché.
With your permission, Anthony, I'm going to co-opt your terminology, at least until something better comes up. Okay? Silence implies consent (right, Thomas Moore?). Lovely.
---
Clinique for Me[n]
I've tried a lot of stuff.
I mean a lot.
I mean I go to cosmetics counters and ask about products they don't even know exist (because they were only offered in Europe or the States or direct through the company's website).
In my experience, there are two kinds of lines. There are the kind which, by some combination of luck and magic produce one incredibly good product and the kind which, through consistent application of a superior philosophy produce a range of superior products.
Vichy Homme’s 'Hydramag Chryo Cooling Under Eye Stick' is an example of the former. It's the best cooling eye stick, indeed, the best all round eye product I've tried to date. The rest of their line is exceptionally unexceptional.
Clinique for Men is the latter. Every single product Clinique for Men makes exudes quality and practical utility.
Long before you notice what Clinique does, you'll notice what they don't do. They don’t do gimmicky packages. No putting their products in containers that look like auto parts to get Joe Savage comfortable enough with the idea of taking care of himself that he can buy a 10 dollar shave cream, or, perish the thought, a moisturizer. No bright shiny silver chrome plated Harley-Davidson looking diamond plate boxes. No promises of insta-lust. No promises of anything - except superior skin care.
In truth, it's not just the Joe Savage types that fall prey to pretty packaging. For years before I gave Clinique a try, I was a Biotherm Homme devotee. My first foray in to logistics, beyond Oxi swabs or Addidas cologne was with Biotherm. Their stuff looks sexy. It feels sexy. It's bright and French and their packages are covered in pictures that promise pretty tubes and prettier faces.
Clinique has none of this. Clinique has clinical looking (though resoundingly masculine), plain black boxes. No graphics. Nothing fancy. It's enough to scare you over to something brighter. But I took a big risk and...
I was disappointed - at first. My initial Clinique for Men purchase was a 3.5 'Scruffing Lotion'. It did look kind of cool, a blue liquid in a transparent square plastic bottle (pictured above). I used it once, didn't care for it, and left in my medicine cabinet, to do what it did best: look cool.
And cool it looked, for months, years even. Until... something came over me and I bought Clinique for Men 'Extra Strength Face Soap'. It came in a cool little dish. The dish probably prompted me to purchase it more than anything. Of course, the dish was no extravagance, just the simplest way to hold the simplest of all cleansers: a bar of soap.
The soap worked well. Really well. Deep cleaning, clean rinsing, and super efficient (after three months I’m half way through my first bar). When I bought the soap, I, like a good logistics consumer, read the literature inside (something I should have done years earlier when I bought the scruffing lotion - oh silly youthful indiscretions). Turns out I’d been using the scruffing lotion the wrong way. It’s not applied gently with a cotton swab, like a traditional toner, but rather with a wash cloth used in vigorous, circular strokes. On top of that, it’s really only effective after using the cleansing soap. So I took the scruffing lotion down from its position of prominent disuse in my medicine cabinet, and started to use it in conjunction with the face soap. What a difference it made! What a team! What a range!
The core of Clinque’s for-men line is their three step system. The first is the face soap (regular or extra strength, depending on your skin type). The second is the scruffing lotion (one of four varieties, again, depending on skin type). The third is a protective moisturizer (either gel or lotion for normal and dry skin, respectively).
Clinque for men is easily my favorite line at the moment. I have been known to be rather fickle about these things, but I am really impressed with their range. I just recently purchased their M Lotion Gel, the ultra light weight daily moisturizer that comprises the third step (above).
I bought their Age Defense eye cream too. Eye creams are probably THE most complex and intricate (not to mention the most expensive) logistics purchase a man will make, and I intend to focus an entire article on them. Without going into detail then, so far, so good.
The only other Clinique for Men product I've purchased was their unscented antiperspirant. Like the rest of the line, its quality is beyond reproach. The cylindrical shape was surprisingly easy to apply, and it's sleek black packaging is a refreshing departure from the adolescent appearance of most antiperspirants. Still, it was lackluster. Not bad and not great, and certainly not worth the 14.00 dollar price tag. Clinique's historical strength is facial care, and that's probably where it should keep its focus. Only the most stalwart brand loyalist would be well advised for follow Clinque into realms best left to Old Spice.
I highly recommend Clinque for Men. Should you choose to purchase any element of their range though, there are a few things you should be aware of. Clinque’s commitment to simplicity means that the texture and character of their products is probably different than anything you’ve used before. For instance, Clinique products are fragrance and dye free. If you’re used to bright, delicious smelling products from the likes of Biotherm or Nivea, it’ll take some getting used to.
But don’t mistake their commitment to simplicity as a green washing move (thanks for the term, Ben Cappellacci). Clinique isn’t all about nature and some exotic mud from a place you can’t pronounce or find on a map. Clinque is about what works: everything that does, nothing that doesn’t. That said, if you’re opposed to using anything that came out of a lab, look elsewhere.
Also note that Clinque products are meant for the serious logistics consumer. They’re somewhat expensive and they’re far from idiot proof. Unlike Vichy’s roll and go stick, it is very easy to overuse the super fine Clinque Age Defense eye cream so be careful. Similarly, the scruffing lotion really requires proper technique for optimal results. You might also have to purchase more (preferably white) washcloths, as you’ll be using at least one per day to apply the lotion.
All together, Clinque for Men is a fantastic line.
Political allies, look sharp. Political opponents, you might as well look sharp too, for the day you get CAUGHT, RED HANDED.
A note on terminology: I don't like the term cosmetics (I'll use it only when absolutely fitting). Neither do I like the word grooming, it sounds like something animals get done to them (again, it's occasionally called for).
My objection to these terms isn't just their feminine (former) or animal (latter) connotations. They're fundamentally inaccurate. Personal care is more closely related to other comprehensive health practices than it is to purely aesthetic ones (like choosing the right deep V). The complexity and chemistry involved in finding good personal care products is more like the complexity and chemistry involved in finding the right foods to eat and the right exercises to do.
Men's personal care companies don't embrace any of the existing terminology either. I predict that in the
next ten years, the industry - and its consumers (like me) - will settle on one word which will become predominant. In the interim, there are all sorts of wacky attempts at circumventing classic terminology.
Clinque, the focus of this article, bills its line of men’s care products simply as 'skin supplies for men'. Supplies? Sounds more like Officemax or Staples than Beautyboutique. But E for effort, Clinque, and way to keep your simple theme and character consistent (more on that later).
Of all the euphemisms and creative copy writing, my favorite belongs to Anthony Logistics for Men. They're so good they even built it into their name. What's their name? Anthony Logistics for Men. What does their range offer? Logistics... for men. Touché.
With your permission, Anthony, I'm going to co-opt your terminology, at least until something better comes up. Okay? Silence implies consent (right, Thomas Moore?). Lovely.
---
Clinique for Me[n]
I've tried a lot of stuff.
I mean a lot.
I mean I go to cosmetics counters and ask about products they don't even know exist (because they were only offered in Europe or the States or direct through the company's website).
In my experience, there are two kinds of lines. There are the kind which, by some combination of luck and magic produce one incredibly good product and the kind which, through consistent application of a superior philosophy produce a range of superior products.
Vichy Homme’s 'Hydramag Chryo Cooling Under Eye Stick' is an example of the former. It's the best cooling eye stick, indeed, the best all round eye product I've tried to date. The rest of their line is exceptionally unexceptional.
Clinique for Men is the latter. Every single product Clinique for Men makes exudes quality and practical utility.
Long before you notice what Clinique does, you'll notice what they don't do. They don’t do gimmicky packages. No putting their products in containers that look like auto parts to get Joe Savage comfortable enough with the idea of taking care of himself that he can buy a 10 dollar shave cream, or, perish the thought, a moisturizer. No bright shiny silver chrome plated Harley-Davidson looking diamond plate boxes. No promises of insta-lust. No promises of anything - except superior skin care.
In truth, it's not just the Joe Savage types that fall prey to pretty packaging. For years before I gave Clinique a try, I was a Biotherm Homme devotee. My first foray in to logistics, beyond Oxi swabs or Addidas cologne was with Biotherm. Their stuff looks sexy. It feels sexy. It's bright and French and their packages are covered in pictures that promise pretty tubes and prettier faces.
Clinique has none of this. Clinique has clinical looking (though resoundingly masculine), plain black boxes. No graphics. Nothing fancy. It's enough to scare you over to something brighter. But I took a big risk and...
I was disappointed - at first. My initial Clinique for Men purchase was a 3.5 'Scruffing Lotion'. It did look kind of cool, a blue liquid in a transparent square plastic bottle (pictured above). I used it once, didn't care for it, and left in my medicine cabinet, to do what it did best: look cool.
And cool it looked, for months, years even. Until... something came over me and I bought Clinique for Men 'Extra Strength Face Soap'. It came in a cool little dish. The dish probably prompted me to purchase it more than anything. Of course, the dish was no extravagance, just the simplest way to hold the simplest of all cleansers: a bar of soap.
The soap worked well. Really well. Deep cleaning, clean rinsing, and super efficient (after three months I’m half way through my first bar). When I bought the soap, I, like a good logistics consumer, read the literature inside (something I should have done years earlier when I bought the scruffing lotion - oh silly youthful indiscretions). Turns out I’d been using the scruffing lotion the wrong way. It’s not applied gently with a cotton swab, like a traditional toner, but rather with a wash cloth used in vigorous, circular strokes. On top of that, it’s really only effective after using the cleansing soap. So I took the scruffing lotion down from its position of prominent disuse in my medicine cabinet, and started to use it in conjunction with the face soap. What a difference it made! What a team! What a range!
The core of Clinque’s for-men line is their three step system. The first is the face soap (regular or extra strength, depending on your skin type). The second is the scruffing lotion (one of four varieties, again, depending on skin type). The third is a protective moisturizer (either gel or lotion for normal and dry skin, respectively).
Clinque for men is easily my favorite line at the moment. I have been known to be rather fickle about these things, but I am really impressed with their range. I just recently purchased their M Lotion Gel, the ultra light weight daily moisturizer that comprises the third step (above).
I bought their Age Defense eye cream too. Eye creams are probably THE most complex and intricate (not to mention the most expensive) logistics purchase a man will make, and I intend to focus an entire article on them. Without going into detail then, so far, so good.
The only other Clinique for Men product I've purchased was their unscented antiperspirant. Like the rest of the line, its quality is beyond reproach. The cylindrical shape was surprisingly easy to apply, and it's sleek black packaging is a refreshing departure from the adolescent appearance of most antiperspirants. Still, it was lackluster. Not bad and not great, and certainly not worth the 14.00 dollar price tag. Clinique's historical strength is facial care, and that's probably where it should keep its focus. Only the most stalwart brand loyalist would be well advised for follow Clinque into realms best left to Old Spice.
I highly recommend Clinque for Men. Should you choose to purchase any element of their range though, there are a few things you should be aware of. Clinque’s commitment to simplicity means that the texture and character of their products is probably different than anything you’ve used before. For instance, Clinique products are fragrance and dye free. If you’re used to bright, delicious smelling products from the likes of Biotherm or Nivea, it’ll take some getting used to.
But don’t mistake their commitment to simplicity as a green washing move (thanks for the term, Ben Cappellacci). Clinique isn’t all about nature and some exotic mud from a place you can’t pronounce or find on a map. Clinque is about what works: everything that does, nothing that doesn’t. That said, if you’re opposed to using anything that came out of a lab, look elsewhere.
Also note that Clinque products are meant for the serious logistics consumer. They’re somewhat expensive and they’re far from idiot proof. Unlike Vichy’s roll and go stick, it is very easy to overuse the super fine Clinque Age Defense eye cream so be careful. Similarly, the scruffing lotion really requires proper technique for optimal results. You might also have to purchase more (preferably white) washcloths, as you’ll be using at least one per day to apply the lotion.
All together, Clinque for Men is a fantastic line.
Political allies, look sharp. Political opponents, you might as well look sharp too, for the day you get CAUGHT, RED HANDED.
Looking Good Doing It - Part I - Introducing the Other Side of Caught Red Handed
Looking Good Doing It - Part I
Introducing the Other Side of Caught Red Handed
The "and looking good doing it" part of the Caught Red Handed mandate isn't just rhetoric. It's real.
My other great passion, in addition to politics, is men's grooming products.
So while I endorse Lindsay Graham's politics (he's great, btw) I'll also endorse his haircut, his cared-for skin and what appears to be his close, irritation-free shave.
Caught Red Handed will divide its time fairly evenly between reviews of men's grooming products, and scathing political indictments. Having already done a great deal of the latter, it's time for the former.
---
Introducing the Other Side of Caught Red Handed
The "and looking good doing it" part of the Caught Red Handed mandate isn't just rhetoric. It's real.
My other great passion, in addition to politics, is men's grooming products.
So while I endorse Lindsay Graham's politics (he's great, btw) I'll also endorse his haircut, his cared-for skin and what appears to be his close, irritation-free shave.
Caught Red Handed will divide its time fairly evenly between reviews of men's grooming products, and scathing political indictments. Having already done a great deal of the latter, it's time for the former.
---
Taylor Loren
Taylor Loren
Now that I have your attention...
No. Just kidding. This post really is about Taylor Loren.
That's because Taylor Loren seems to think Caught Red Handed is anonymous. It's not.
Trouble is: Taylor Loren is a girl about town. Nobody could accuse her of being uninformed about UBC politics. So if SHE can think this blog is anonymous, it's not unreasonable to assume that others think so too.
Of course, if you looked at the bottom of... well... any article, you'd see that it is, in fact, written by ME.
I was especially displeased to hear that someone of Taylor's eminence could think my blog was anonymous because: a) I said hai to Taylor at the AMS meeting b) I don't really like anonymous blogs and don't recognize their place outside of real leak sites (you don't count blackboxtheater). Anonymity is all hearsay. It can't be taken seriously. The accused have no opportunity to cross examine their accusers. Rumors get started (like the one about Hillel funding Bijan) that can never be put to rest because the kind of adversarial dialogue required for a definitive conclusion can't happen. Anonymity is not healthy for a political blog. That's why I chose to take full credit for Caught Red Handed, from day one.
Who am I?
Julian 'McCarthy' .
Who is Julian 'McCarthy'?
A political, slightly metrosexual man from Toronto who loves New York, dabbles in philosophy and theology, and currently resides in Vancouver. Between you and me, Taylor, I'm not even very conservative. I'm a genuine moderate. On campus, that puts me just right of Karl Rove. In truth though, I really am moderate. You don't believe me. But look, I'll prove it.
I do support the Conservative Party of Canada, true, but that is really more about my support for being fiscally and internationally responsible. Except for differences on taxes (which are more technical than political) and the Conservatives' stronger support for the armed forces (always a good idea), the Conservatives aren't too different from the Liberals, long considered Canada's most central political party.
The thing is that in Canada, due to the political climate, the Constitution and the make-up of our Supreme Court, there really isn't any dimension of social conservatism (issues on which I'd tend more to radical center). After the same sex marriage debate ended for the last time, the book was essentially closed on issues of social politics in this country. Abortion is legal. It always will be. It's a Constitutional thing that nobody can change. And there are no mainstream voices calling for change. That's why there is no pro-life/pro-choice discourse in Canadian politics. For what it's worth, I'm pro-choice.
Gay marriage is the same deal. Again, I'm for it, with the obvious qualification that it should not be forced upon religious groups. The whole notion of state marriage is a tricky one, but so long as it exists, two people - be they men or women or... otherwise - should be able partake of its privileges. Religions should be, and are, able to marry who ever they want according to their own tenants.
So on abortion... pro choice. On gay marriage... pro choice.
On gun control, I'm strongly opposed. I feel like the issue really warrants its own post. Suffice it to say that when catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults.
Foreign policy is probably the realm in which I'm most conservative. But it's also the realm in which traditional definitions of conservative and liberal tend to fall apart. I take objection, for instance, to many of the so-called conservative isolationists who have grown in popularity of late. I'm for a strong, interventionist foreign policy. I believe that increased American/Canadian and NATO participation in world affairs, both politically and diplomatically, is good for us, and the rest of the world.
I am realistic about the war on terror. I am neither interested in prosecuting an impossible war, nor in surrender. I am familiar with the existential threat that extremism poses to our way of life, and I invite its swift destruction through the most expeditious, moral means available.
In the United States, I would probably be a very moderate Republican or Democrat, so close to center, in fact, that it wouldn't really matter which. (I'd probably be a Republican though, because their radicals annoy me less than the dems' radicals do, and because Abraham Lincoln was a Republic, and come on, he was ABRAHAM FREAKIN LINCOLN! That and their logo is an elephant. I LOVE elephants.)
So there you have it: yet another dastardly liberal myth defeated on Caught Red Handed.
Now that I have your attention...
No. Just kidding. This post really is about Taylor Loren.
That's because Taylor Loren seems to think Caught Red Handed is anonymous. It's not.
Trouble is: Taylor Loren is a girl about town. Nobody could accuse her of being uninformed about UBC politics. So if SHE can think this blog is anonymous, it's not unreasonable to assume that others think so too.
Of course, if you looked at the bottom of... well... any article, you'd see that it is, in fact, written by ME.
I was especially displeased to hear that someone of Taylor's eminence could think my blog was anonymous because: a) I said hai to Taylor at the AMS meeting b) I don't really like anonymous blogs and don't recognize their place outside of real leak sites (you don't count blackboxtheater). Anonymity is all hearsay. It can't be taken seriously. The accused have no opportunity to cross examine their accusers. Rumors get started (like the one about Hillel funding Bijan) that can never be put to rest because the kind of adversarial dialogue required for a definitive conclusion can't happen. Anonymity is not healthy for a political blog. That's why I chose to take full credit for Caught Red Handed, from day one.
Who am I?
Julian 'McCarthy' .
Who is Julian 'McCarthy'?
A political, slightly metrosexual man from Toronto who loves New York, dabbles in philosophy and theology, and currently resides in Vancouver. Between you and me, Taylor, I'm not even very conservative. I'm a genuine moderate. On campus, that puts me just right of Karl Rove. In truth though, I really am moderate. You don't believe me. But look, I'll prove it.
I do support the Conservative Party of Canada, true, but that is really more about my support for being fiscally and internationally responsible. Except for differences on taxes (which are more technical than political) and the Conservatives' stronger support for the armed forces (always a good idea), the Conservatives aren't too different from the Liberals, long considered Canada's most central political party.
The thing is that in Canada, due to the political climate, the Constitution and the make-up of our Supreme Court, there really isn't any dimension of social conservatism (issues on which I'd tend more to radical center). After the same sex marriage debate ended for the last time, the book was essentially closed on issues of social politics in this country. Abortion is legal. It always will be. It's a Constitutional thing that nobody can change. And there are no mainstream voices calling for change. That's why there is no pro-life/pro-choice discourse in Canadian politics. For what it's worth, I'm pro-choice.
Gay marriage is the same deal. Again, I'm for it, with the obvious qualification that it should not be forced upon religious groups. The whole notion of state marriage is a tricky one, but so long as it exists, two people - be they men or women or... otherwise - should be able partake of its privileges. Religions should be, and are, able to marry who ever they want according to their own tenants.
So on abortion... pro choice. On gay marriage... pro choice.
On gun control, I'm strongly opposed. I feel like the issue really warrants its own post. Suffice it to say that when catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults.
Foreign policy is probably the realm in which I'm most conservative. But it's also the realm in which traditional definitions of conservative and liberal tend to fall apart. I take objection, for instance, to many of the so-called conservative isolationists who have grown in popularity of late. I'm for a strong, interventionist foreign policy. I believe that increased American/Canadian and NATO participation in world affairs, both politically and diplomatically, is good for us, and the rest of the world.
I am realistic about the war on terror. I am neither interested in prosecuting an impossible war, nor in surrender. I am familiar with the existential threat that extremism poses to our way of life, and I invite its swift destruction through the most expeditious, moral means available.
In the United States, I would probably be a very moderate Republican or Democrat, so close to center, in fact, that it wouldn't really matter which. (I'd probably be a Republican though, because their radicals annoy me less than the dems' radicals do, and because Abraham Lincoln was a Republic, and come on, he was ABRAHAM FREAKIN LINCOLN! That and their logo is an elephant. I LOVE elephants.)
So there you have it: yet another dastardly liberal myth defeated on Caught Red Handed.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)